NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce 830M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce 830M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.22 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 256
- Environ 53% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 588.8 gflops
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1126 versus 1008
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 154 versus 136
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5925 versus 4160
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 16.955
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 168.449 versus 156.544
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 versus 1.013
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 17.81
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 67.443
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1729
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1729
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 12 March 2014 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 256 |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 588.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1126 versus 1008 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 versus 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5925 versus 4160 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 16.955 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 versus 156.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 versus 1.013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 17.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 67.443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1082 MHz versus 1072 MHz
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 versus 3065
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 versus 3065
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz versus 1072 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 versus 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 versus 3065 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce 830M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1126 | 1008 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5925 | 4160 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 16.955 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 156.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 1.013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 17.81 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 67.443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 3589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 3589 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GM108 | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1227 | 1228 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |