NVIDIA GeForce 940M versus NVIDIA GeForce 830M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 940M and NVIDIA GeForce 830M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 940M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 28.22 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 256
- Environ 53% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 903.2 gflops versus 588.8 gflops
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1126 versus 1010
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 154 versus 136
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 5931 versus 4160
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.98 versus 16.955
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 168.449 versus 156.544
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.307 versus 1.013
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.837 versus 17.81
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.399 versus 67.443
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2132 versus 1729
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2132 versus 1729
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s versus 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 256 |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops versus 588.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1126 versus 1010 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 versus 136 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5931 versus 4160 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 versus 16.955 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 versus 156.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 versus 1.013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 versus 17.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 versus 67.443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 versus 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 versus 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3352 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 830M
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1082 MHz versus 1072 MHz
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3589 versus 3065
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3589 versus 3065
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1082 MHz versus 1072 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3589 versus 3065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3589 versus 3065 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 830M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce 830M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1126 | 1010 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 154 | 136 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5931 | 4160 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.98 | 16.955 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 168.449 | 156.544 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.307 | 1.013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.837 | 17.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.399 | 67.443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2132 | 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3065 | 3589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2132 | 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3065 | 3589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 940M | NVIDIA GeForce 830M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1226 | 1227 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1072 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 903.2 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.22 GTexel / s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 940M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6370M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 930M
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
NVIDIAGeForce 940M vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
