NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 68% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 730 MHz
- 2.1x plus de vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 780 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2433 versus 896
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 versus 304
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9864 versus 5684
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.898 versus 12.111
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.373 versus 1.211
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 73.506
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3629 versus 1645
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 2426
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 versus 1677
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3629 versus 1645
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 2426
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 versus 1677
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 versus 30 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 versus 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 versus 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 versus 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 versus 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 versus 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 versus 1677 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 253.178 versus 170.785
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 versus 18.937
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 253.178 versus 170.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 versus 18.937 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2433 | 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9864 | 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 1677 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 35 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | N17P-G1 | Oland |
Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 30 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 874 | 1199 |
Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 780 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 730 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 50 Watt |
Performance á point flottant | 599.0 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 18.72 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None |