NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) versus NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 937 MHz
- Environ 61% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1670 MHz versus 1038 MHz
- Environ 20% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2473 versus 2278
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 versus 215
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9706 versus 9425
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 160.823 versus 145.794
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1083 versus 990
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 937 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz versus 1038 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2473 versus 2278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 versus 215 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9706 versus 9425 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 versus 145.794 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1083 versus 990 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 30 Watt
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 45.905 versus 36.898
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 495.238 versus 170.785
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.365 versus 1.373
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.965 versus 18.937
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3331
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 versus 3629
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 versus 3684
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3331
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 30 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 versus 36.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 versus 170.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 versus 1.373 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 versus 18.937 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 versus 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 versus 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 versus 3629 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 versus 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3331 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2473 | 2278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 | 215 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9706 | 9425 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.898 | 45.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 170.785 | 495.238 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.373 | 2.365 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.937 | 38.965 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 160.823 | 145.794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3629 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3629 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1083 | 990 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | N17P-G1 | GP108 |
| Date de sortie | 17 May 2017 | 17 May 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $69.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 862 | 905 |
| Prix maintenant | $59.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 63.91 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1670 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,127 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 48.06 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X300
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GS AGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X1450
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1030 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
