NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 64% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 43.92 GTexel / s versus 26.7 billion / sec
- Environ 36% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 352
- Environ 64% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,405 gflops versus 855.4 gflops
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 1280 MB versus 1 GB
- 2.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3800 MHz versus 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.499 versus 19.079
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 versus 2.516
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.208 versus 24.513
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 versus 64.492
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5405 versus 2999
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 3660
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3321
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5405 versus 2999
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 3660
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3321
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 December 2010 versus 31 May 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.92 GTexel / s versus 26.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 480 versus 352 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,405 gflops versus 855.4 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1280 MB versus 1 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz versus 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 versus 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 versus 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 versus 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 versus 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 versus 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 versus 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Environ 66% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1215 MHz versus 732 MHz
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 219 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 741.303 versus 708.853
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1215 MHz versus 732 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 219 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 versus 708.853 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.499 | 19.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 708.853 | 741.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 | 2.516 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.208 | 24.513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 | 64.492 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3321 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2654 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9600 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF110 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 7 December 2010 | 31 May 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $279 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 823 | 824 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $263.28 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,405 gflops | 855.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 480 | 352 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 43.92 GTexel / s | 26.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 219 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Performance de Compute | 30x | |
Noyaux CUDA | 352 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 105 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | Two 6-pins |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way3-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1280 MB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 152.0 GB / s | 102.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3800 MHz | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |