NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp versus AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 33% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1190 MHz
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 versus 8931
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 versus 8931
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1190 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 versus 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 versus 8931 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 250 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | 8931 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6586 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 779 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27118 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2911 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 329 | 332 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | |
| Nom de code | Polaris 22 | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1063 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,656 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 114.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DisplayPort, HDMI | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Longeur | 10.5 in | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin + 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.7 GB/s | 204.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon HD 7970 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
