NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp versus AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon Pro 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 109.521
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 versus 1206.829
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 versus 9.88
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 versus 511.984
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 versus 10113
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 2900
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 versus 10113
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 2900
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 versus 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 versus 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 versus 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 versus 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 versus 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 versus 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 2900 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 versus 34.491
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 versus 34.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3343 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | 109.521 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | 9.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | 117.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | 511.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40270 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 329 | 330 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | |
Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 3840 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Vitesse du noyau | 1100 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,175 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 193.0 GTexel / s | |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | DisplayPort, HDMI | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.4 in | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5 in | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6-pin + 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.7 GB/s | 256.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6780 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |