NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp versus AMD Radeon Pro 580

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon Pro 580 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp

versus

AMD Radeon Pro 580

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp

Environ 32% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 versus 109.521
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 versus 1206.829
2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 versus 9.88
2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 versus 511.984
Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 versus 10113
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 2900
Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 versus 10113
Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 2900

Caractéristiques
Vitesse augmenté	1582 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Taille de mémore maximale	12 GB versus 8 GB
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	255.521 versus 109.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2621.94 versus 1206.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	21.26 versus 9.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1376.357 versus 511.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10550 versus 10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 versus 2900
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10550 versus 10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 versus 2900

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 580

Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.944 versus 34.491

Caractéristiques
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt versus 250 Watt
Référence
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	117.944 versus 34.491
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 versus 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 versus 3343

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

255.521

109.521

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2621.94

1206.829

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

21.26

9.88

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.491

117.944

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1376.357

511.984

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10550

10113

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

2900

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3343

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10550

10113

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

2900

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3343

3353

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp	AMD Radeon Pro 580
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	255.521	109.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	2621.94	1206.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	21.26	9.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	34.491	117.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1376.357	511.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10550	10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3343	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10550	10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3343	3353
PassMark - G3D Mark		7753
PassMark - G2D Mark		943
Geekbench - OpenCL		40270

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp	AMD Radeon Pro 580
Essentiel
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	328	330
Genre	Desktop	Workstation
Architecture		GCN 4.0
Nom de code		Polaris 20
Date de sortie		5 June 2017
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1582 MHz	1200 MHz
Noyaux CUDA	3840
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	150 Watt
Vitesse du noyau		1100 MHz
Performance á point flottant		6,175 gflops
Processus de fabrication		14 nm
Pipelines		2304
Taux de remplissage de la texture		193.0 GTexel / s
Compte de transistor		5,700 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	DisplayPort, HDMI	No outputs
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Hauteur	4.4 in
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	10.5 in	241 mm
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)	600 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	6-pin + 8-pin	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	12 GB	8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	547.7 GB/s	256.0 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	384 bit	256 Bit
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Vitesse de mémoire		6780 MHz
Technologies
GameStream
GPU Boost
SLI
VR Ready