NVIDIA GeForce MX350 versus AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Mémoire, Soutien API, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1468 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 46.98 GTexel/s versus 40 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 6.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 125 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 56% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) versus 1125 MHz
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 versus 2174
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4655 versus 3707
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4655 versus 3707
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1247 versus 711
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 versus 15 February 2012 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1468 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel/s versus 40 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 125 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) versus 1125 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 versus 2174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 versus 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 versus 3707 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 versus 711 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 versus 235
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 14263 versus 13562
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4524 versus 3715
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 14630 versus 3356
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4524 versus 3715
- 4.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 14630 versus 3356
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 versus 235 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14263 versus 13562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4524 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 14630 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4524 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 14630 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 | 2174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 462 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13562 | 14263 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4655 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 14630 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4655 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 4524 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 14630 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 | 711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.836 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 506.712 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.01 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.787 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 153.657 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | AMD Radeon HD 7770 GHz Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | Cape Verde |
| Date de sortie | 10 Feb 2020 | 15 February 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 654 | 557 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1468 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.879 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 23.49 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.98 GTexel/s | 40 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 125 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3300 million | 1,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,280 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 210 mm | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 56.06 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) | 1125 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX350 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XT
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
ATIRadeon X800 XL
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7900 GTX
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce MX350 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
