NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.349 versus 174.185
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 23659
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 23659
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 versus 174.185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 23659 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21601 versus 19514
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 928 versus 920
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 134929 versus 115804
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 338.122
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 4571.03
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.104 versus 31.6
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1653.08
- 1768.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3537 versus 2
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21601 versus 19514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 928 versus 920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 134929 versus 115804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 4571.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.104 versus 31.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1653.08 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3537 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 | 21601 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 928 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 | 134929 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | 41.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | 174.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 3537 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 110 | 91 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 496 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |