NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 3072
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1021 versus 920
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121168 versus 115519
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 338.122
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 31.6
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 1653.08
- 1299x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2598 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 23 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 3072 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19568 versus 19538 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 versus 920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121168 versus 115519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 31.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 1653.08 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2598 versus 2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4571.03 versus 4156.52
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.349 versus 162.131
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 22050
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 22050
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 versus 4156.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 versus 162.131 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3715 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19568 | 19538 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 | 920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121168 | 115519 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 4571.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 31.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 190.349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1653.08 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2598 | 2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 23 July 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 105 | 108 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | |
Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |