NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19558 versus 18707
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 versus 796
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 115519 versus 74179
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.349 versus 153.677
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1653.08 versus 1534.582
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 19571
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 19571
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19558 versus 18707 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 versus 796 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115519 versus 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 versus 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 versus 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 19571 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 338.122
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 4571.03
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 31.6
- 6971.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 versus 2
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 4571.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 31.6 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19558 | 18707 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 796 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115519 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $6,299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 116 | 119 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 496 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |