NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2304
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 8.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 November 2018 |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3714 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 780 - 960 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1380 - 1485 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 18169
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 18169
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85474 versus 68858
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 780 - 960 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1380 - 1485 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 18169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 18169 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85474 versus 68858 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 | 85474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 182 | 194 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 780 - 960 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 13600 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |