NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire versus NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 9016 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 versus 64226
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 1916.09
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 17.951
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 31.471
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 545.751
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 versus 8770
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 versus 1 October 2016 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 9016 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 versus 64226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 545.751 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 versus 8770 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1405 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1645 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Environ 4% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 394.8 GTexel / s versus 379.7 GTexel / s
- Environ 4% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,634 gflops versus 12,150 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 194.277 versus 146.609
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 versus 16138
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 versus 16138
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1405 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1645 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 394.8 GTexel / s versus 379.7 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 12,634 gflops versus 12,150 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 12 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 versus 146.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 versus 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 versus 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 64226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 31.471 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 545.751 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 20035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 8770 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15308 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP102 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $5,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 227 | 226 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Prix maintenant | $4,403.52 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 12,634 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3840 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 11,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Synchronization de plusieurs écrans | Quadro Sync II | |
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
Options SLI | 1 | |
Largeur | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |