NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 1156 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1471 MHz
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 3584
- 1157.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,150 gflops versus 10.5 TFLOPs
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- 7.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 1765.06
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 12.606
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 79.32
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1022.925
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 14462
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 14462
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 versus 6879
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 versus 14 August 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 1156 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1471 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 3584 |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops versus 10.5 TFLOPs |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 14462 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 versus 6879 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 330.00 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 19% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 210 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 versus 65520
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 184.405 versus 146.609
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 330.00 GTexel/s versus 379.7 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 210 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 versus 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 versus 146.609 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 163998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 184.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 1765.06 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 12.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 79.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 1022.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 6879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13200 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | GP102 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 | 14 August 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 227 | 225 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1471 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 1156 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 10.5 TFLOPs |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 330.00 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 210 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 56 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 94.00 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 410 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 2048 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |