NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order versus AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 1382 MHz
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3611.018
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 17.789
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1373.944
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 12980
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 12980
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 versus 7074
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 versus 27 June 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 1382 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3611.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 17.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1373.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 12980 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 versus 7074 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1600 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Environ 8% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 409.6 GTexel / s versus 379.7 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3840
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 13,107 gflops versus 12,150 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 75705 versus 65520
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 versus 146.609
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 163.551
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s versus 379.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 3840 |
Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops versus 12,150 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 12 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75705 versus 65520 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 versus 146.609 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 163.551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 75705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 3611.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 17.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 181.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 1373.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | 7074 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | GP102 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 | 27 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 216 | 198 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 1382 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 13,107 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 409.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 12,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 483.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | HBM2 |