AMD A10-8700P vs AMD A10 Pro-7350B
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-8700P und AMD A10 Pro-7350B Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-8700P
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 0 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 27% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 19 Watt
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1146 vs 917
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2245 vs 1915
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 372 vs 319
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1022 vs 821
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.577 vs 1.867
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 875 vs 607
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1563 vs 884
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4890 vs 2724
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 875 vs 607
- Etwa 77% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1563 vs 884
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4890 vs 2724
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 3 June 2015 vs 4 June 2014 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 19 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1146 vs 917 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2245 vs 1915 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 372 vs 319 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1022 vs 821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.577 vs 1.867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 875 vs 607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1563 vs 884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4890 vs 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 875 vs 607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1563 vs 884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4890 vs 2724 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10 Pro-7350B
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 19.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 114.182 vs 5.923
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.549 vs 0.129
- 28.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.33 vs 0.403
- 15.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.923 vs 3.048
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz |
L2 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 114.182 vs 5.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.549 vs 0.129 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.33 vs 0.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 47.923 vs 3.048 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-8700P
CPU 2: AMD A10 Pro-7350B
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-8700P | AMD A10 Pro-7350B |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1146 | 917 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2245 | 1915 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 372 | 319 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1022 | 821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.577 | 1.867 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.923 | 114.182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.129 | 0.549 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.403 | 11.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.048 | 47.923 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 875 | 607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1563 | 884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4890 | 2724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 875 | 607 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1563 | 884 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4890 | 2724 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD A10-8700P | AMD A10 Pro-7350B | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Carrizo | Kaveri |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
Startdatum | 3 June 2015 | 4 June 2014 |
OPN Tray | AM870PAAY43KA | AM735BECH44JA |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2114 | 2116 |
Serie | AMD A10-Series APU for AIOs | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Laptops |
Vertikales Segment | All-in-One | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Compute Cores | 10 | 10 |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | 6 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 2410 Million |
Freigegeben | ||
Matrizengröße | 245 mm | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | DDR3 / DDR3L-1600 |
Grafik |
||
Enduro | ||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | 553 MHz |
iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | 384 |
Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 384 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FP3 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 19 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
RAID | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |