AMD A4-5000 vs AMD A6-5200
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A4-5000 und AMD A6-5200 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A4-5000
- Etwa 67% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A6-5200
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 664 vs 508
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1663 vs 1297
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 224 vs 175
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 703 vs 580
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.512 vs 2.119
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.259 vs 5.104
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.156 vs 0.111
- 26.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.377 vs 0.24
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.954 vs 1.373
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 549 vs 479
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1223 vs 1133
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3036 vs 2123
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 549 vs 479
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1223 vs 1133
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3036 vs 2123
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 664 vs 508 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1663 vs 1297 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 224 vs 175 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 703 vs 580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.512 vs 2.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.259 vs 5.104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.156 vs 0.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.377 vs 0.24 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.954 vs 1.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 549 vs 479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1223 vs 1133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3036 vs 2123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 549 vs 479 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1223 vs 1133 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3036 vs 2123 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A4-5000
CPU 2: AMD A6-5200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A4-5000 | AMD A6-5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 508 | 664 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1297 | 1663 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 175 | 224 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 580 | 703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.119 | 2.512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.104 | 8.259 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 | 0.156 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.24 | 6.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.373 | 1.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 479 | 549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1133 | 1223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2123 | 3036 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 479 | 549 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1133 | 1223 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2123 | 3036 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A4-5000 | AMD A6-5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Kabini | Kabini |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 23 May 2013 | 23 May 2013 |
| OPN Tray | AM5000IBJ44HMD | AM5200IAJ44HMD |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2811 | 2484 |
| Serie | AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A6-Series APU for Desktops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop, Tablet | Desktop |
| OPN PIB | ||
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 90 °C | 90 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | 1178 million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 1 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 500 MHz | 600 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 128 | 128 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon HD 8330 | AMD Radeon HD 8400 |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 128 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FT3 | FT3 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A4-5000 mit anderen
AMDA4-5000 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T6570
AMDA4-5000 vs
AMDTurion 64 X2 L510
AMDA4-5000 vs
AMDAthlon II Neo K145
AMDA4-5000 vs
AMDA4-3330MX
AMDA4-5000 vs
IntelCeleron 1047UE
AMDA4-5000 vs
IntelAtom C2558
