AMD A4-5000 versus AMD A6-5200
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A4-5000 et AMD A6-5200 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A4-5000
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 25 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 25 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A6-5200
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 664 versus 508
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1663 versus 1297
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 224 versus 175
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 703 versus 580
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.512 versus 2.119
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 8.259 versus 5.104
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.156 versus 0.111
- 26.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.377 versus 0.24
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.954 versus 1.373
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 549 versus 479
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1223 versus 1133
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3036 versus 2123
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 549 versus 479
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1223 versus 1133
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3036 versus 2123
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 664 versus 508 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1663 versus 1297 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 224 versus 175 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 703 versus 580 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.512 versus 2.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.259 versus 5.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.156 versus 0.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.377 versus 0.24 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.954 versus 1.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 549 versus 479 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1223 versus 1133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3036 versus 2123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 549 versus 479 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1223 versus 1133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3036 versus 2123 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A4-5000
CPU 2: AMD A6-5200
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD A4-5000 | AMD A6-5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 508 | 664 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1297 | 1663 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 175 | 224 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 580 | 703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.119 | 2.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5.104 | 8.259 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 | 0.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.24 | 6.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.373 | 1.954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 479 | 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1133 | 1223 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2123 | 3036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 479 | 549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1133 | 1223 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2123 | 3036 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD A4-5000 | AMD A6-5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Kabini | Kabini |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | 23 May 2013 | 23 May 2013 |
OPN Tray | AM5000IBJ44HMD | AM5200IAJ44HMD |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2811 | 2484 |
Série | AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops | AMD A6-Series APU for Desktops |
Segment vertical | Laptop, Tablet | Desktop |
OPN PIB | ||
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 1.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
Cache L1 | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 90 °C | 90 °C |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 1178 million | 1178 million |
Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 1 |
Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 500 MHz | 600 MHz |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 128 | 128 |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon HD 8330 | AMD Radeon HD 8400 |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Nombre de pipelines | 128 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | FT3 | FT3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |