AMD A6-6310 vs AMD E2-3800
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A6-6310 und AMD E2-3800 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A6-6310
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 742 vs 436
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1674 vs 1152
- Etwa 57% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 245 vs 156
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 727 vs 548
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 625 vs 449
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1018 vs 769
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2308 vs 1691
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 625 vs 449
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1018 vs 769
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2308 vs 1691
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 29 April 2014 vs 2 November 2013 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 742 vs 436 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1674 vs 1152 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 245 vs 156 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 727 vs 548 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 625 vs 449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1018 vs 769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2308 vs 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 625 vs 449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1018 vs 769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2308 vs 1691 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A6-6310
CPU 2: AMD E2-3800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A6-6310 | AMD E2-3800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 742 | 436 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1674 | 1152 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 245 | 156 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 727 | 548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.599 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.408 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.76 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 625 | 449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1018 | 769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2308 | 1691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 625 | 449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1018 | 769 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2308 | 1691 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD A6-6310 | AMD E2-3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Beema | Kabini |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD E-Series Processors |
Startdatum | 29 April 2014 | 2 November 2013 |
OPN PIB | ||
OPN Tray | AM6310ITJ44JBD | EM3800IBJ44HM |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2705 | 2720 |
Serie | AMD A6-Series APU for Laptops | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops |
Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Matrizengröße | 107 mm | |
L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
Maximale Frequenz | 2.4 GHz | |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 930 Million | |
Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 1 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L-1865 | DDR3 |
Grafik |
||
Enduro | ||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | 450 MHz |
iGPU Kernzahl | 128 | 128 |
Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8280 |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 128 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Unterstützte Sockel | FT3b | FT3 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |