AMD PRO A10-8770E vs AMD A8-9600
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD PRO A10-8770E und AMD A8-9600 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Grafikschnittstellen. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A10-8770E
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- Etwa 86% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2131 vs 475
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4938 vs 1409
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.458 vs 3.637
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 292.262 vs 129.751
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.344 vs 1.041
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.533 vs 20.198
- 14.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 75.093 vs 5.073
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2131 vs 475 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4938 vs 1409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.458 vs 3.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 292.262 vs 129.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.344 vs 1.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.533 vs 20.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.093 vs 5.073 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-9600
- Der Prozessor ist entsperrt, ein entsperrter Multiplikator ermöglicht eine einfachere Übertaktung
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1490 vs 1446
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3314 vs 3036
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2015 vs 1292
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3006 vs 1298
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9707 vs 4797
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2015 vs 1292
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3006 vs 1298
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9707 vs 4797
| Spezifikationen | |
| Freigegeben | Freigegeben vs Gesperrt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1490 vs 1446 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3314 vs 3036 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 vs 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 vs 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 vs 4797 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 vs 1292 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 vs 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 vs 4797 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-8770E
CPU 2: AMD A8-9600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A10-8770E | AMD A8-9600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1446 | 1490 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3036 | 3314 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2131 | 475 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4938 | 1409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.458 | 3.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 292.262 | 129.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.344 | 1.041 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.533 | 20.198 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.093 | 5.073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1292 | 2015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1298 | 3006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4797 | 9707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1292 | 2015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1298 | 3006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4797 | 9707 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD PRO A10-8770E | AMD A8-9600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | Q3 2016 | 27 July 2017 |
| OPN Tray | AD877BAHM44AB | AD9600AGM44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1060 | 1081 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $78 | |
| OPN PIB | AD9600AGABBOX | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $64.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 22.69 | |
Leistung |
||
| Base frequency | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 6 |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 74 °C | |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 847 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Prozessorgrafiken | R7 | Radeon R7 Series |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Enduro | ||
| iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 8 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD PRO A10-8770E mit anderen
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i5-2500T
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i5-2390T
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDA8-9600
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDPRO A12-9800
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDA10-7860K
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i3-7101E
