AMD PRO A10-8770E vs AMD PRO A12-9800
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD PRO A10-8770E und AMD PRO A12-9800 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Grafikschnittstellen. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A10-8770E
- Etwa 86% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 292.262 vs 279.396
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1292 vs 1176
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1298 vs 477
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4797 vs 1715
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1292 vs 1176
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1298 vs 477
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4797 vs 1715
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 292.262 vs 279.396 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1292 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1298 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4797 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1292 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1298 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4797 vs 1715 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A12-9800
- Etwa 20% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1705 vs 1448
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3755 vs 3018
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.268 vs 15.458
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.975 vs 1.344
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.196 vs 24.533
- Etwa 76% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 131.8 vs 75.093
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1705 vs 1448 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3755 vs 3018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 vs 15.458 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 vs 1.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 vs 24.533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 vs 75.093 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-8770E
CPU 2: AMD PRO A12-9800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A10-8770E | AMD PRO A12-9800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1448 | 1705 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3018 | 3755 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2131 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4938 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.458 | 26.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 292.262 | 279.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.344 | 1.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.533 | 34.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 75.093 | 131.8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1292 | 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1298 | 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4797 | 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1292 | 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1298 | 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4797 | 1715 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD PRO A10-8770E | AMD PRO A12-9800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | Q3 2016 | 3 October 2016 |
| OPN Tray | AD877BAHM44AB | AD980BAUM44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1053 | 1054 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 2.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | 8 |
| Freigegeben | ||
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Unterstützte Speicherfrequenz | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 847 MHz | 1108 MHz |
| Prozessorgrafiken | R7 | R7 |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD PRO A10-8770E mit anderen
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i5-2500T
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDPRO A12-9800
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDA10-7860K
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i3-7101E
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
AMDRyzen 5 3400GE
AMDPRO A10-8770E vs
IntelCore i5-10400F
