AMD PRO A8-9600 vs AMD PRO A12-9800

Vergleichende Analyse von AMD PRO A8-9600 und AMD PRO A12-9800 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Unterschiede

Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A8-9600

  • Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1299 vs 1176
  • 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1377 vs 477
  • 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4551 vs 1715
  • Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1299 vs 1176
  • 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1377 vs 477
  • 2.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4551 vs 1715
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1299 vs 1176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1377 vs 477
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4551 vs 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1299 vs 1176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1377 vs 477
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4551 vs 1715

Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A12-9800

  • Etwa 24% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
  • Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1686 vs 1505
  • Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3705 vs 3359
  • Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.268 vs 17.191
  • Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.396 vs 269.509
  • Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.975 vs 1.523
  • Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.196 vs 27.695
  • Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 131.8 vs 84.399
Spezifikationen
Maximale Frequenz 4.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1686 vs 1505
PassMark - CPU mark 3705 vs 3359
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.268 vs 17.191
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 279.396 vs 269.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.975 vs 1.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 34.196 vs 27.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 131.8 vs 84.399

Benchmarks vergleichen

CPU 1: AMD PRO A8-9600
CPU 2: AMD PRO A12-9800

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1505
1686
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
3359
3705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
17.191
26.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
269.509
279.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.523
1.975
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
27.695
34.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
84.399
131.8
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1299
1176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1377
477
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4551
1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1299
1176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1377
477
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4551
1715
Name AMD PRO A8-9600 AMD PRO A12-9800
PassMark - Single thread mark 1505 1686
PassMark - CPU mark 3359 3705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 17.191 26.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 269.509 279.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.523 1.975
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 27.695 34.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 84.399 131.8
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1299 1176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1377 477
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 4551 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1299 1176
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1377 477
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 4551 1715

Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen

AMD PRO A8-9600 AMD PRO A12-9800

Essenzielles

Family AMD PRO A-Series Processors AMD PRO A-Series Processors
Startdatum 3 October 2016 3 October 2016
OPN Tray AD960BAGM44AB AD980BAUM44AB
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung 942 995
Serie AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Desktops AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops
Vertikales Segment Desktop Desktop

Leistung

Base frequency 3.1 GHz 3.8 GHz
L2 Cache 2 MB 2 MB
Fertigungsprozesstechnik 28 nm 28 nm
Maximale Kerntemperatur 90°C 90°C
Maximale Frequenz 3.4 GHz 4.2 GHz
Anzahl der Adern 4 4
Number of GPU cores 6 8
Freigegeben

Speicher

Maximale Speicherkanäle 2 2
Supported memory frequency 2400 MHz 2400 MHz

Grafik

Enduro
Grafik Maximalfrequenz 900 MHz 1108 MHz
Prozessorgrafiken R7 R7
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Grafikschnittstellen

DisplayPort
HDMI

Unterstützung der Grafik-API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan

Kompatibilität

Configurable TDP 45 Watt/65 Watt
Unterstützte Sockel AM4 AM4
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) 65 Watt 65 Watt

Peripherien

PCI Express Revision 3.0 3.0

Fortschrittliche Technologien

AMD Secure technology
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
System Image Stability
TrueAudio

Virtualisierung

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0