AMD Pro A8-8600B vs AMD A8-5500
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Pro A8-8600B und AMD A8-5500 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Pro A8-8600B
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 4.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.432 vs 4.063
- 26.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 229.764 vs 8.685
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.849 vs 0.185
- 24.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.472 vs 0.504
- 12.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.061 vs 3.038
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 3 June 2015 vs October 2012 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.432 vs 4.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.764 vs 8.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.849 vs 0.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.472 vs 0.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.061 vs 3.038 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-5500
- Etwa 7% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1333 vs 1107
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2610 vs 2226
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 455 vs 362
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1243 vs 1026
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 789 vs 713
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2225 vs 780
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4729 vs 2559
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 789 vs 713
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2225 vs 780
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4729 vs 2559
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz |
L2 Cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 2 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1333 vs 1107 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2610 vs 2226 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 455 vs 362 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1243 vs 1026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 789 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2225 vs 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4729 vs 2559 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 789 vs 713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2225 vs 780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4729 vs 2559 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Pro A8-8600B
CPU 2: AMD A8-5500
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Pro A8-8600B | AMD A8-5500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1107 | 1333 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2226 | 2610 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | 455 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1026 | 1243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.432 | 4.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 229.764 | 8.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.849 | 0.185 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.472 | 0.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.061 | 3.038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 713 | 789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 780 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2559 | 4729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 713 | 789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 780 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2559 | 4729 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Pro A8-8600B | AMD A8-5500 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Carrizo | Trinity |
Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
Startdatum | 3 June 2015 | October 2012 |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1906 | 1959 |
Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops | |
Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 1.6 GHz | |
Compute Cores | 10 | |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB (per core) |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Maximale Frequenz | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 1178 million |
Freigegeben | ||
Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 71 °C | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 / DDR3L-2133 | DDR3 |
Grafik |
||
Enduro | ||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 720 MHz | |
iGPU Kernzahl | 384 | |
Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 384 | |
Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FM2 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
RAID | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |