Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs AMD A4-5000
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Atom x5-Z8350 und AMD A4-5000 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Unterstützung der Grafik-API. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Atom x5-Z8350
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 11x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 55.944 vs 5.104
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.334 vs 0.111
- 14.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.487 vs 0.24
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1180 vs 1133
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1180 vs 1133
Spezifikationen | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 55.944 vs 5.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.334 vs 0.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.487 vs 0.24 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1180 vs 1133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1180 vs 1133 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A4-5000
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 504 vs 472
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1285 vs 893
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 175 vs 168
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 580 vs 529
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.119 vs 2.011
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.373 vs 1.185
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 479 vs 380
- Etwa 83% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2123 vs 1160
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 479 vs 380
- Etwa 83% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2123 vs 1160
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 504 vs 472 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1285 vs 893 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 175 vs 168 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 580 vs 529 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.119 vs 2.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.373 vs 1.185 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 479 vs 380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2123 vs 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 479 vs 380 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2123 vs 1160 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Atom x5-Z8350
CPU 2: AMD A4-5000
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Atom x5-Z8350 | AMD A4-5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 472 | 504 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 893 | 1285 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 168 | 175 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 529 | 580 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.011 | 2.119 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 55.944 | 5.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.334 | 0.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.487 | 0.24 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.185 | 1.373 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 380 | 479 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1180 | 1133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1160 | 2123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 380 | 479 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1180 | 1133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1160 | 2123 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 | AMD A4-5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Cherry Trail | Kabini |
Startdatum | Q1'16 | 23 May 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2808 | 2823 |
Processor Number | x5-Z8350 | |
Serie | Intel® Atom™ Processor X Series | AMD A4-Series APU for Laptops |
Status | Launched | |
Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Laptop, Tablet |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
OPN Tray | AM5000IBJ44HMD | |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 1.44 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
Maximale Frequenz | 1.92 GHz | |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
L1 Cache | 256 KB | |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | |
Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 90 °C | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | |
Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 1 |
Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 12.8 GB/s | |
Maximale Speichergröße | 2 GB | |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L-RS 1600 | DDR3 |
Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
Grafik |
||
Ausführungseinheiten | 12 | |
Graphics base frequency | 200 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 500 MHz | |
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 500 MHz | 500 MHz |
Maximaler Videospeicher | 2 GB | |
Enduro | ||
iGPU Kernzahl | 128 | |
Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon HD 8330 | |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 2 | |
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 17mm x 17mm | |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 2 W | |
Unterstützte Sockel | UTFCBGA592 | FT3 |
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Peripherien |
||
Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 1 | |
PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | 1x1 | |
USB-Überarbeitung | 3.0 | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
Secure Boot | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan |