Intel Celeron N3060 vs Intel Pentium N3700
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Celeron N3060 und Intel Pentium N3700 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron N3060
- Etwa 3% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.48 GHz vs 2.40 GHz
- Etwa 75% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.598 vs 2.632
- 6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 70.313 vs 11.663
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.449 vs 0.127
- 8.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.417 vs 0.51
- 5.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.107 vs 1.706
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1431 vs 1298
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2267 vs 2070
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1431 vs 1298
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2267 vs 2070
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.48 GHz vs 2.40 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 vs 2.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.313 vs 11.663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 vs 0.127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.417 vs 0.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 vs 1.706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 vs 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 vs 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 vs 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 vs 2070 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Pentium N3700
- 2 mehr Kerne, mehr Anwendungen auf einmal ausführen: 4 vs 2
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 633 vs 628
- Etwa 90% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1255 vs 660
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 569 vs 498
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 569 vs 498
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 vs 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 633 vs 628 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1255 vs 660 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 569 vs 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 569 vs 498 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Celeron N3060
CPU 2: Intel Pentium N3700
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron N3060 | Intel Pentium N3700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 628 | 633 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 660 | 1255 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 | 2.632 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.313 | 11.663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 | 0.127 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.417 | 0.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.107 | 1.706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 498 | 569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 | 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2267 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 498 | 569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 | 1298 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2267 | 2070 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 212 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 686 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron N3060 | Intel Pentium N3700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Braswell | Braswell |
| Startdatum | 1 April 2015 | 1 April 2015 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $107 | $161 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2308 | 2714 |
| Processor Number | N3060 | N3700 |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Jetzt kaufen | $444.78 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 1.22 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.48 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L-1600 | DDR3L-1600 |
Grafik |
||
| Ausführungseinheiten | 12 | 16 |
| Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 600 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel HD Graphics 400 | Intel HD Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | Yes |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | Yes |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 25mm x 27mm |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | 4 W |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Integriertes LAN | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 4 | 4 |
| Maximale Anzahl der SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der USB-Ports | 5 | 5 |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 |
| Gesamtzahl der SATA-Anschlüsse | 2 | 2 |
| UART | ||
| USB-Überarbeitung | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage Technologie (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron N3060 mit anderen
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core T3100
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCore i5-3340M
IntelCeleron N3060 vs
IntelCore M-5Y10
