Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 und Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 7% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.13 GHz vs 2 GHz
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 837 vs 796
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 783 vs 748
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 278 vs 270
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 473 vs 457
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.231 vs 0.217
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.066 vs 0.065
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.679 vs 1.576
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 January 2009 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.13 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 837 vs 796 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 783 vs 748 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 278 vs 270 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 473 vs 457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.231 vs 0.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.066 vs 0.065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 vs 1.576 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.882 vs 13.657
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.421 vs 0.362
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.882 vs 13.657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.421 vs 0.362 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 837 | 796 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 783 | 748 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 278 | 270 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 473 | 457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.231 | 0.217 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.657 | 13.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.066 | 0.065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.362 | 0.421 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 | 1.576 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Startdatum | 1 January 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 3241 | 3246 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $39.99 | $19.99 |
| Processor Number | P7450 | P7350 |
| Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 10.44 | 19.03 |
| Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.13 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Matrizengröße | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Frontseitiger Bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L2 Cache | 3072 KB | 3072 KB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID-Spannungsbereich | 1.050V-1.150V | 1.062V-1.150V |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Unterstützte Sockel | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| FSB-Parität | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 mit anderen
IntelCore 2 Duo P7450 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7300
IntelCore 2 Duo P7450 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7350
IntelCore 2 Duo P7450 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo SL9400
