Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 versus Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 et Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.13 GHz versus 2 GHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 837 versus 796
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 783 versus 748
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 278 versus 270
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 473 versus 457
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.231 versus 0.217
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.066 versus 0.065
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.679 versus 1.576
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 January 2009 versus 15 July 2008 |
Fréquence maximale | 2.13 GHz versus 2 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 837 versus 796 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 783 versus 748 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 278 versus 270 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 473 versus 457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.231 versus 0.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.066 versus 0.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 versus 1.576 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.882 versus 13.657
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.421 versus 0.362
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.882 versus 13.657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.421 versus 0.362 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 837 | 796 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 783 | 748 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 278 | 270 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 473 | 457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.231 | 0.217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.657 | 13.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.066 | 0.065 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.362 | 0.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.679 | 1.576 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 | Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
Date de sortie | 1 January 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3241 | 3246 |
Prix maintenant | $39.99 | $19.99 |
Processor Number | P7450 | P7350 |
Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.44 | 19.03 |
Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.13 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
Cache L2 | 3072 KB | 3072 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
Rangée de tension VID | 1.050V-1.150V | 1.062V-1.150V |
Cache L1 | 128 KB | |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Prise courants soutenu | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 25 Watt |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
FSB parity | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |