Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 und Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1603 vs 935
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3497 vs 905
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.26 vs 0.24
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1603 vs 935 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3497 vs 905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.26 vs 0.24 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
- Etwa 8% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1427 vs 298
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2203 vs 506
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 18.982 vs 17.798
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.079 vs 0.074
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.408 vs 0.344
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.074 vs 1.895
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1427 vs 298 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2203 vs 506 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 18.982 vs 17.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 vs 0.074 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.408 vs 0.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.074 vs 1.895 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1603 | 935 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3497 | 905 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 298 | 1427 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 506 | 2203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.26 | 0.24 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 17.798 | 18.982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.074 | 0.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.344 | 0.408 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.895 | 2.074 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Merom | Merom |
Startdatum | 2 September 2007 | 18 August 2007 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $307 | $515 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 3001 | 2816 |
Jetzt kaufen | $59.95 | $607.99 |
Processor Number | T7700 | T7800 |
Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 6.97 | 0.78 |
Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
Matrizengröße | 143 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
Frontseitiger Bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 Cache | 64 KB | 64 KB |
L2 Cache | 4096 KB | 4 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
Maximale Frequenz | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 2 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 291 million | 291 million |
VID-Spannungsbereich | 1.075V-1.250V | |
Kompatibilität |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Unterstützte Sockel | PPGA478, PBGA479 | PBGA479, PPGA478 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
FSB-Parität | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |