Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs AMD Athlon II X4 640
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 und AMD Athlon II X4 640 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Speicher. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1221 vs 1212
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2346 vs 2245
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 vs 358
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1299 vs 1191
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30.904 vs 7.618
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.175 vs 0.17
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.476 vs 4.052
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1221 vs 1212 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2346 vs 2245 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 vs 358 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 vs 1191 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 vs 7.618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 vs 0.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 vs 4.052 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Athlon II X4 640
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.776 vs 0.612
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.776 vs 0.612 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU 2: AMD Athlon II X4 640
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Athlon II X4 640 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1221 | 1212 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2346 | 2245 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 358 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1299 | 1191 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.612 | 2.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30.904 | 7.618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.175 | 0.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.476 | 4.052 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 | AMD Athlon II X4 640 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Yorkfield | Propus |
| Startdatum | Q1'08 | May 2010 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 3013 | 3020 |
| Processor Number | Q9550 | |
| Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $80 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $239.95 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 4.07 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2.83 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Matrizengröße | 214 mm2 | 169 mm |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.4°C | |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 820 million | 300 million |
| VID-Spannungsbereich | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3 GHz | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | LGA775 | AM3 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| FSB-Parität | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Speicher |
||
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 mit anderen
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E6300
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo E8400
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 640
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDAthlon II X4 631
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
IntelCeleron J1800
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9550 vs
AMDA4-4020
