Intel Core i7-9700K vs Intel Core i9-9900K
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core i7-9700K und Intel Core i9-9900K Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i9-9900K
- 8 Mehr Kanäle: 16 vs 8
- Etwa 2% höhere Taktfrequenz: 5.00 GHz vs 4.90 GHz
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L3 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L3 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2922 vs 2868
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 18182 vs 14424
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1336 vs 1306
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 8781 vs 7386
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score: 7011 vs 5855
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.968 vs 9.136
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 202.925 vs 195.695
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.504 vs 1.105
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.779 vs 5.449
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.406 vs 15.67
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4003 vs 1155
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6679 vs 2066
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4003 vs 1155
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6679 vs 2066
| Spezifikationen | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 16 vs 8 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 5.00 GHz vs 4.90 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) vs 12 MB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2922 vs 2868 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 18182 vs 14424 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1336 vs 1306 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 8781 vs 7386 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7011 vs 5855 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.968 vs 9.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.925 vs 195.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.504 vs 1.105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.779 vs 5.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.406 vs 15.67 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2165 vs 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4003 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6679 vs 2066 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2165 vs 2156 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4003 vs 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6679 vs 2066 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-9700K
CPU 2: Intel Core i9-9900K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-9700K | Intel Core i9-9900K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2868 | 2922 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 14424 | 18182 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1306 | 1336 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7386 | 8781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 5855 | 7011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.136 | 12.968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.695 | 202.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.105 | 1.504 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.449 | 6.779 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.67 | 17.406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2156 | 2165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1155 | 4003 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2066 | 6679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2156 | 2165 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1155 | 4003 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2066 | 6679 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Core i7-9700K | Intel Core i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake |
| Startdatum | October 2018 | October 2018 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1386 | 792 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $409.99 | $909 |
| Prozessornummer | i7-9700K | i9-9900K |
| Serie | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 12.64 | 6.63 |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 3.60 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 100°C | 100°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.90 GHz | 5.00 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 8 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 16 |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 41.6 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E98 | 0x3E98 |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.20 GHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | 3 |
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Gehäusegröße | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D (130W) | PCG 2015D (130W) |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 16 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Skalierbarkeit | 1S Only | 1S Only |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Speicher unterstützt | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Plattform-Berechtigung | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Core i7-9700K mit anderen
IntelCore i7-9700K vs
AMDA10-7870K
IntelCore i7-9700K vs
IntelCore i7-6700
IntelCore i7-9700K vs
IntelCore i5-7400
IntelCore i7-9700K vs
IntelCore i7-7820X
IntelCore i7-9700K vs
AMDA6-9500E
IntelCore i7-9700K vs
AMDA6-6420K
