AMD Radeon 625 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon 625 und Intel UHD Graphics P630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon 625
- 2.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 730 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 24
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6501 vs 5648
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.22 vs 24.713
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.423 vs 37.743
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2032 vs 2010
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2920 vs 2273
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 3019
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2032 vs 2010
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2920 vs 2273
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 3019
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 730 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 vs 5648 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 vs 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 vs 37.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 vs 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 vs 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 vs 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 vs 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 3019 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Etwa 17% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- 64x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 128 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2075 vs 1074
- Etwa 60% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 vs 208
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.49 vs 18.876
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 387.561 vs 322.556
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.089 vs 1.478
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Maximale Speichergröße | 128 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2075 vs 1074 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 vs 208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 vs 18.876 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 vs 322.556 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 vs 1.478 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 625
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics P630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 625 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1074 | 2075 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 | 333 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6501 | 5648 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | 20.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | 387.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | 2.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 | 37.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2032 | 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2920 | 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 | 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2032 | 2010 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2920 | 2273 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 | 3019 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon 625 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 3.0 | |
Codename | Polaris 24 | |
Startdatum | 13 May 2019 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1122 | 1082 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1024 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 6 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 730 MHz | 350 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 786.4 GFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.192 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
Breite | IGP | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 128 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 14.40 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) | |
Speichertyp | DDR3 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |