AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 M390 und NVIDIA Quadro M1000M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390
- 2048x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20526 vs 8849
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 38.33
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 721.18
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 3.056
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 42.938
- Etwa 76% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 137.786
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 4196
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 4196
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20526 vs 8849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 38.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 721.18 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 3.056 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 42.938 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 137.786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 4196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 4196 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1232
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1232
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 18 August 2015 vs 09 June 2015 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20526 | 8849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 38.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 721.18 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 3.056 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 42.938 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 137.786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | GCN | Maxwell |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM107 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Startdatum | 09 June 2015 | 18 August 2015 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 803 | 806 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $203.37 | |
| Typ | Mobile workstation | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 16.10 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 2 GB / 4 GB |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Speicherbandbreite | 80 GB / s | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1072 MHz | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 993 MHz | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,017 gflops | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Laptop-Größe | large | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
