AMD Radeon R9 M390 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R9 M390 und NVIDIA Quadro M1000M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390
- 2048x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20353 vs 8849
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 vs 38.33
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 vs 721.18
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 vs 3.056
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 vs 42.938
- Etwa 76% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 vs 137.786
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 vs 4196
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 vs 4196
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20353 vs 8849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 vs 38.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 vs 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 vs 3.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 vs 42.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 vs 137.786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 vs 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 vs 4196 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1232
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1232
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 18 August 2015 vs 09 June 2015 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3351 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20353 | 8849 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 38.33 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 3.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 42.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 137.786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2842 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 308 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN | Maxwell |
Codename | Pitcairn | GM107 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Startdatum | 09 June 2015 | 18 August 2015 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 838 | 841 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $203.37 | |
Typ | Mobile workstation | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 16.10 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 2 GB / 4 GB |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Speicherbandbreite | 80 GB / s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1072 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 993 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,017 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
Leitungssysteme | 512 | |
Texturfüllrate | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None |