AMD Radeon R9 M390 versus NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 M390 and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390
- 2048x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20526 versus 8849
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 44.394 versus 38.33
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 881.959 versus 721.18
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.028 versus 3.056
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 73.782 versus 42.938
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 241.868 versus 137.786
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6227 versus 4196
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6227 versus 4196
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20526 versus 8849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 versus 38.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 versus 721.18 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 versus 3.056 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 versus 42.938 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 versus 137.786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 versus 4196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 versus 4196 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 1232
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 1232
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 09 June 2015 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 1232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M390
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20526 | 8849 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 44.394 | 38.33 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 881.959 | 721.18 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.028 | 3.056 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.782 | 42.938 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 241.868 | 137.786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6227 | 4196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1232 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6227 | 4196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1232 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 M390 | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | Pitcairn | GM107 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 09 June 2015 | 18 August 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 803 | 806 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
| Prix maintenant | $203.37 | |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB / 4 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1072 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,017 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
