Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon R7 M370
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics P630 und AMD Radeon R7 M370 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Etwa 25% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1200 MHz vs 960 MHz
- 32x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 128 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2194 vs 1418
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.49 vs 17.26
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.089 vs 1.653
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2010 vs 1747
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 vs 1484
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3019 vs 2449
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2010 vs 1747
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 vs 1484
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3019 vs 2449
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Maximale Speichergröße | 128 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2194 vs 1418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 vs 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 vs 1.653 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 vs 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 vs 2449 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 M370
- 2.6x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 24
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 329
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6909 vs 5635
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 vs 387.561
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.082 vs 24.713
- Etwa 86% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.174 vs 37.743
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 900 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 329 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6909 vs 5635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 vs 387.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 vs 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 vs 37.743 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R7 M370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2194 | 1418 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5635 | 6909 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 476.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 1.653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 30.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 70.174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 2449 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1072 | 929 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Architektur | GCN 1.0 | |
Codename | Litho | |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Startdatum | 5 May 2015 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | 960 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
Leitungssysteme | 24 | 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 737.3 gflops | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | |
Texturfüllrate | 23.04 GTexel / s | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,040 million | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 128 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 73.6 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore | ||
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | |
Eyefinity | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized |