NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA T400 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA T400
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Monat(e) später
- 5.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 170 Watt
Startdatum | 6 May 2021 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- 3.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1320 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1777 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 5.8x mehr Texturfüllrate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s
- 9.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 3584 vs 384
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 6x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 2 GB
- Etwa 50% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 17019
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 vs 58.805
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 vs 785.059
- 7.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 vs 3.961
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 188.944 vs 53.111
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 vs 222.15
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22495 vs 5088
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2173
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22495 vs 5088
- Etwa 71% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2173
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1320 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1777 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 34.20 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 3584 vs 384 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 17019 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 vs 58.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 vs 785.059 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 vs 3.961 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 vs 53.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 vs 222.15 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 vs 5088 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 vs 5088 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3346 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 | 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 188.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3356 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Ampere |
Codename | TU117 | GA106 |
Startdatum | 6 May 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 851 | 134 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $329 | |
Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1425 MHz | 1777 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 420 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt | 170 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | 13250 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 200 Watt | 450 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 12-pin |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 12 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 80.00 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 bit | 192 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |