AMD A10-7860K vs AMD PRO A12-9800
Comparative analysis of AMD A10-7860K and AMD PRO A12-9800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A10-7860K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1721 vs 1176
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1671 vs 477
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6023 vs 1715
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1721 vs 1176
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1671 vs 477
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6023 vs 1715
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1721 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6023 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1721 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6023 vs 1715 |
Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A12-9800
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz
- Around 26% higher maximum core temperature: 90°C vs 71.30°C
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1686 vs 1488
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3705 vs 3282
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.268 vs 5.11
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.396 vs 245.697
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.975 vs 1.362
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.196 vs 27.192
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 131.8 vs 89.484
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C vs 71.30°C |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1686 vs 1488 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3705 vs 3282 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 vs 5.11 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 vs 245.697 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 vs 1.362 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 vs 27.192 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 vs 89.484 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A10-7860K
CPU 2: AMD PRO A12-9800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-7860K | AMD PRO A12-9800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1488 | 1686 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3282 | 3705 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 516 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1510 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.11 | 26.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 245.697 | 279.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.362 | 1.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.192 | 34.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.484 | 131.8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1721 | 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6023 | 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1721 | 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6023 | 1715 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A10-7860K | AMD PRO A12-9800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| OPN PIB | AD786KYBJABOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD786KYBI44JC | AD980BAUM44AB |
| Place in performance rating | 1075 | 1062 |
| Series | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch date | 3 October 2016 | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.30°C | 90°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 4 | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 757 MHz | 1108 MHz |
| iGPU core count | 512 | |
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | R7 |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Sockets supported | FM2+ | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A10-7860K with others
AMDA10-7860K vs
IntelCore i5-2390T
AMDA10-7860K vs
AMDA8-9600
AMDA10-7860K vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1920X
AMDA10-7860K vs
IntelCeleron G3900T
AMDA10-7860K vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3400GE
AMDA10-7860K vs
IntelCore i3-10100T
