AMD A10-7860K vs AMD PRO A12-9800
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-7860K und AMD PRO A12-9800 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Peripherien. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-7860K
- Der Prozessor ist entsperrt, ein entsperrter Multiplikator ermöglicht eine einfachere Übertaktung
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1721 vs 1176
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1671 vs 477
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6023 vs 1715
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1721 vs 1176
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1671 vs 477
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6023 vs 1715
Spezifikationen | |
Freigegeben | Freigegeben vs Gesperrt |
L2 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1721 vs 1176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 vs 477 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6023 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1721 vs 1176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 vs 477 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6023 vs 1715 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A12-9800
- Etwa 5% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz
- Etwa 26% höhere Kerntemperatur: 90°C vs 71.30°C
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1686 vs 1488
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3705 vs 3282
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.268 vs 5.11
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.396 vs 245.697
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.975 vs 1.362
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.196 vs 27.192
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 131.8 vs 89.484
Spezifikationen | |
Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz vs 4 GHz |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C vs 71.30°C |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1686 vs 1488 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3705 vs 3282 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 vs 5.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 vs 245.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 vs 1.362 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 vs 27.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 vs 89.484 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-7860K
CPU 2: AMD PRO A12-9800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A10-7860K | AMD PRO A12-9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1488 | 1686 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3282 | 3705 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 516 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1510 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.11 | 26.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 245.697 | 279.396 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.362 | 1.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.192 | 34.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.484 | 131.8 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1721 | 1176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1671 | 477 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6023 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1721 | 1176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1671 | 477 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6023 | 1715 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD A10-7860K | AMD PRO A12-9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
OPN PIB | AD786KYBJABOX | |
OPN Tray | AD786KYBI44JC | AD980BAUM44AB |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1075 | 1062 |
Serie | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops |
Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Startdatum | 3 October 2016 | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Leistung |
||
Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Compute Cores | 12 | |
L1 Cache | 256 KB | |
L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.30°C | 90°C |
Maximale Frequenz | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Grafik |
||
Enduro | ||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 757 MHz | 1108 MHz |
iGPU Kernzahl | 512 | |
Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | R7 |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Unterstützte Sockel | FM2+ | AM4 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
AMD Secure technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 3.0 |