AMD A4-1200 vs AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-1200 and AMD Athlon 64 TF-20 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-1200

• CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 65 nm
• 2048x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 3.9 Watt vs 25 Watt
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 369 vs 265
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 891 vs 660

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

• Around 60% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 454 vs 303
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 687 vs 559

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-1200
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 TF-20

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	303 454
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	369 265
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	559 687
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	891 660

Compare specifications (specs)