AMD A4-3300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E6300

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3300 and Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 1.87 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
• 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 973 vs 690
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 942 vs 634
• Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 274 vs 251

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E6300

• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-3300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E6300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	973 690
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	942 634
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	274 251
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	445 446

Compare specifications (specs)