AMD A4-3300 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3300 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
  • Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.503 vs 0.609
  • 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 71.876 vs 20.494
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.657 vs 1.4
Specifications (specs)
Launch date September 2011 vs April 2009
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm vs 45 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.503 vs 0.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 71.876 vs 20.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.657 vs 1.4

Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400

  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • Around 7% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1142 vs 973
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2068 vs 942
  • Around 32% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 362 vs 274
  • 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1139 vs 445
  • Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.171 vs 0.104
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.93 vs 1.739
Specifications (specs)
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 2.67 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 512 KB (per core)
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1142 vs 973
PassMark - CPU mark 2068 vs 942
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 362 vs 274
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1139 vs 445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.171 vs 0.104
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.93 vs 1.739

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-3300
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
973
1142
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
942
2068
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
274
362
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
445
1139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.503
0.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
71.876
20.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.104
0.171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
3.657
1.4
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.739
4.93
Name AMD A4-3300 Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
PassMark - Single thread mark 973 1142
PassMark - CPU mark 942 2068
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 274 362
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 445 1139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.503 0.609
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 71.876 20.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.104 0.171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 3.657 1.4
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1.739 4.93
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 360

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD A4-3300 Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400

Essentials

Architecture codename Llano Yorkfield
Launch date September 2011 April 2009
Place in performance rating 3000 3008
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Price now $99.50
Processor Number Q8400
Series Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors
Status Discontinued
Value for money (0-100) 9.38

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 228 mm 164 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 32 nm 45 nm
Maximum frequency 2.5 GHz 2.67 GHz
Number of cores 2 4
Transistor count 1178 million 456 million
Base frequency 2.66 GHz
Bus Speed 1333 MHz FSB
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 71 °C
Maximum core temperature 71.4°C
VID voltage range 0.8500V-1.3625V

Memory

Supported memory types DDR3 DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported FM1 LGA775
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available
Package Size 37.5mm x 37.5mm

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
FSB parity
Idle States
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Thermal Monitoring