AMD A4-3300 vs AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640

Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3300 and AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3300

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 973 vs 489
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 942 vs 430

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640

• Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A4-3300
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	973 489
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	942 430

Compare specifications (specs)