AMD A4-3400 vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Comparative analysis of AMD A4-3400 and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A4-3400
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher clock speed: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 89 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 344 vs 219
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 625 vs 398
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | September 2011 vs May 2006 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 90 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 89 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 344 vs 219 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 625 vs 398 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1285 vs 1089
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1285 vs 1089 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A4-3400
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD A4-3400 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1084 | 0 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1089 | 1285 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 344 | 219 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 625 | 398 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.658 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A4-3400 | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Llano | Manchester |
| Launch date | September 2011 | May 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 3012 | 3318 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $309 | |
| Price now | $179.95 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.80 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 228 mm | 156 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | 154 million |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FM1 | 939 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
