AMD A6-3400M vs AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3400M and AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3400M

• CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 44% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 703 vs 564
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1221 vs 534

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52

• Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 35 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-3400M
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	703 564
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1221 534

Compare specifications (specs)