AMD A6-3400M vs AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

Comparative analysis of AMD A6-3400M and AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3400M

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 53% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 703 vs 567
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1221 vs 556

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

• Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A6-3400M
CPU 2: AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	703 567
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1221 556

Compare specifications (specs)