AMD A8-3800 vs AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-3800 and AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3800
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 26% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1044 vs 644
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2041 vs 570
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | June 2011 vs October 2007 |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.9 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1044 vs 644 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2041 vs 570 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-3800
CPU 2: AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-3800 | AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1044 | 644 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2041 | 570 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 338 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1184 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A8-3800 | AMD Athlon X2 BE-2300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Llano | Brisbane |
Launch date | June 2011 | October 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 2765 | 2784 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 228 mm | 126 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 154 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FM1 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |