AMD A8-3800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo E4700
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-3800 and Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-3800
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1044 vs 949
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2041 vs 900
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 338 vs 311
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1184 vs 512
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | June 2011 vs March 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 2048 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1044 vs 949 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2041 vs 900 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 338 vs 311 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1184 vs 512 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo E4700
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-3800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo E4700
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD A8-3800 | Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1044 | 949 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2041 | 900 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 338 | 311 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1184 | 512 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A8-3800 | Intel Core 2 Duo E4700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Llano | Conroe |
| Launch date | June 2011 | March 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 2784 | 2787 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $26.99 | |
| Processor Number | E4700 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.19 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 228 mm | 111 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 2048 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | 167 million |
| Base frequency | 2.60 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 73.3°C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FM1 | PLGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||