AMD A8-9600 vs AMD A9-9425
Comparative analysis of AMD A8-9600 and AMD A9-9425 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A8-9600
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1486 vs 1331
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3298 vs 1527
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 129.751 vs 112.324
- Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.041 vs 0.615
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.198 vs 13.577
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2015 vs 943
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3006 vs 1243
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9707 vs 3556
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2015 vs 943
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3006 vs 1243
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9707 vs 3556
Specifications (specs) | |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1486 vs 1331 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3298 vs 1527 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 129.751 vs 112.324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.041 vs 0.615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.198 vs 13.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 vs 943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 vs 1243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 vs 3556 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 vs 943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 vs 1243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 vs 3556 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9425
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2034 vs 475
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3077 vs 1409
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.781 vs 3.637
- 8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 40.717 vs 5.073
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 2034 vs 475 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3077 vs 1409 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.781 vs 3.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.717 vs 5.073 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A8-9600
CPU 2: AMD A9-9425
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD A8-9600 | AMD A9-9425 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1486 | 1331 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3298 | 1527 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 475 | 2034 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1409 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.637 | 7.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 129.751 | 112.324 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.041 | 0.615 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.198 | 13.577 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.073 | 40.717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 | 943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 | 1243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 | 3556 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 | 943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 | 1243 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 | 3556 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A8-9600 | AMD A9-9425 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge | Stoney Ridge |
Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Launch date | 27 July 2017 | 2Q18 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $78 | |
OPN PIB | AD9600AGABBOX | |
OPN Tray | AD9600AGM44AB | AM9425AYN23AC |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Place in performance rating | 1079 | 1566 |
Price now | $64.99 | |
Series | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.69 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Compute Cores | 10 | 5 |
Die size | 246 mm | 124 mm |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 74 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 90°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | 3 |
Transistor count | 1178 million | 1200 million |
Unlocked | ||
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | 900 MHz |
iGPU core count | 6 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon R7 Series | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | 10-15 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM4 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
PCI Express revision | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS) | ||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |