AMD A9-9400 SoC vs AMD Phenom II X4 830
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9400 SoC and AMD Phenom II X4 830 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9400 SoC
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 45 nm
- 9.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1195 vs 1084
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2016 vs September 2009 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1195 vs 1084 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 830
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 17% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2070 vs 1329
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2070 vs 1329 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9400 SoC
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 830
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD A9-9400 SoC | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1195 | 1084 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1329 | 2070 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.759 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.738 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.079 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1799 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1799 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1838 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 5258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD A9-9400 SoC | AMD Phenom II X4 830 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Deneb |
Launch date | May 2016 | September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1543 | 1552 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
Price now | $79.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.66 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 124 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 758 million |
L3 cache | 4096 KB (shared) | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 95 Watt |
Sockets supported | AM3 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |