AMD A9-9400 SoC vs Intel Celeron G1850
Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9400 SoC and Intel Celeron G1850 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Peripherals, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9400 SoC
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 53 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1799 vs 1786
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5100 vs 3067
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1799 vs 1786
- Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5100 vs 3067
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2016 vs May 2014 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 53 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1799 vs 1786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 vs 3067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1799 vs 1786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 vs 3067 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron G1850
- Around 21% higher clock speed: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1583 vs 1199
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1909 vs 1332
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1583 vs 1199 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1909 vs 1332 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD A9-9400 SoC
CPU 2: Intel Celeron G1850
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A9-9400 SoC | Intel Celeron G1850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1199 | 1583 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1332 | 1909 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.759 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 49.738 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.848 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 21.079 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 894 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1799 | 1786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5100 | 3067 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 894 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1799 | 1786 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5100 | 3067 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 605 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1054 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD A9-9400 SoC | Intel Celeron G1850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Haswell |
| Launch date | May 2016 | May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1542 | 1543 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $101 | |
| Price now | $79.99 | |
| Processor Number | G1850 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 10.70 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 124 mm | 177 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | 1400 million |
| Base frequency | 2.90 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 72°C | |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V |
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 53 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 1.7 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD A9-9400 SoC with others
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
AMDPhenom II X4 830
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
IntelCeleron G1850
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
AMDRyzen 5 1500X
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
IntelPentium Gold G5500
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
IntelCore i3-3250T
AMDA9-9400 SoC vs
AMDA8-7500
