AMD A9-9410 SoC vs AMD A9-9425

Comparative analysis of AMD A9-9410 SoC and AMD A9-9425 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9410 SoC

  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L2 cache 1024 KB (per core) vs 1 MB

Reasons to consider the AMD A9-9425

  • Around 28% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
Maximum frequency 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 25 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD A9-9410 SoC
CPU 2: AMD A9-9425

Name AMD A9-9410 SoC AMD A9-9425
PassMark - Single thread mark 1318
PassMark - CPU mark 1513
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 2034
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 3077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.781
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 112.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.615
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.577
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 40.717
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 943
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1243
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3556
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 943
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1243
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3556

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD A9-9410 SoC AMD A9-9425

Essentials

Architecture codename Stoney Ridge Stoney Ridge
Launch date May 2016 2Q18
Place in performance rating not rated 1560
Vertical segment Desktop Laptop
Family AMD A-Series Processors
OPN Tray AM9425AYN23AC
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Series AMD A9-Series APU for Laptops

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 124 mm 124 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 128 KB (per core)
L2 cache 1024 KB (per core) 1 MB
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 74 °C 74 °C
Maximum frequency 2.9 GHz 3.7 GHz
Number of cores 2 2
Transistor count 1200 million 1200 million
Base frequency 3.1 GHz
Compute Cores 5
Maximum core temperature 90°C
Number of GPU cores 3
Unlocked

Memory

Supported memory types DDR4 DDR4
Max memory channels 1
Supported memory frequency 2133 MHz

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt
Configurable TDP 10-15 Watt

Advanced Technologies

Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Adaptive Voltage and Frequency Scaling (AVFS)
AMD App Acceleration
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)

Graphics

Enduro
Graphics max frequency 900 MHz
Processor graphics AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12
Vulkan

Peripherals

PCI Express revision 3.0

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD A9-9410 SoC with others

AMD A9-9410 SoC AMD
A9-9410 SoC
vs Intel Core i7-6800K Intel
Core i7-6800K
AMD A9-9410 SoC AMD
A9-9410 SoC
vs AMD A9-9425 AMD
A9-9425
AMD A9-9410 SoC AMD
A9-9410 SoC
vs AMD A9-9420 SoC AMD
A9-9420 SoC