AMD Athlon 1333 vs AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 1333 and AMD Athlon 64 3400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 1333
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 89 Watt
| Launch date | March 2001 vs January 2001 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3400+
- Around 80% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 130 nm vs 180 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 180 nm |
| L2 cache | 512 KB vs 256 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 1333
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3400+
| Name | AMD Athlon 1333 | AMD Athlon 64 3400+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 652 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon 1333 | AMD Athlon 64 3400+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird C | Clawhammer |
| Launch date | March 2001 | January 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 2778 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Die size | 120 mm | 193 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.33 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 37 million | 105 million |
| 64 bit support | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | A | 754 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 89 Watt |