AMD Athlon 1333 vs AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 1333 and AMD Athlon 64 3400+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 1333
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 89 Watt
Launch date | March 2001 vs January 2001 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 3400+
- Around 80% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 130 nm vs 180 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 180 nm |
L2 cache | 512 KB vs 256 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 1333
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Name | AMD Athlon 1333 | AMD Athlon 64 3400+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 652 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 545 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 1333 | AMD Athlon 64 3400+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thunderbird C | Clawhammer |
Launch date | March 2001 | January 2001 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 2772 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Die size | 120 mm | 193 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.33 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 37 million | 105 million |
64 bit support | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 89 Watt |